Printer Friendly
The Free Library
19,569,808 articles and books
Member login
User name  
Password 
 
Join us Forgot password?

$100 Million Lawsuit Filed Against Forest City Enterprises -- Plaintiffs Represented by California-Based Senn Palumbo Meulemans.


SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 21, 1999--

Forest City Accused of Putting Employees and Community

at Risk By Improperly Removing and Illegally Disposing

Of Hazardous Materials

Forest City Enterprises, and its affiliates, the owners and renovators of the Colony Woods Apartments in Bellevue, Wash., and The Knolls Apartments in Orange, Calif., are being sued by 65 former employees for $100 million.

The employees allege that during renovation of these projects, Forest City illegally forced them to remove hazardous materials without any safety equipment, did not disclose the presence of asbestos, deadly molds and lead paint to the workers and illegally disposed of these hazardous materials into community landfills.

The plaintiffs are being represented by Kevin J. Senn and Catherine S. Meulemans of the San Francisco-based law firm, Senn Palumbo Meulemans LLP LLP - Lower Layer Protocol , in the suit filed in Los Angeles Los Angeles (lôs ăn`jələs, lŏs, ăn`jəlēz'), city (1990 pop. 3,485,398), seat of Los Angeles co., S Calif.; inc. 1850.  Superior Court on September 21, 1999.

"This is a true injustice affecting not only the workers, who were put at serious risk, but in many cases, their families, as workers, spouses and young children were encouraged to live in the projects in exchange for lower wages. This proved to be hazardous to their health and well being," said Senn.

"Forest City's focus on profits over the safety of their employees and the communities involved is inexcusable."

The suit alleges that in 1996, Forest City initiated extensive renovation of the Colony Woods project (also known as Pacific Village Apartments) in Bellevue, Wash., with federal funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The project encompassed 36 buildings separated into 396 units -- a significant portion of which were previously deemed unfit for human habitation HABITATION, civil law. It was the right of a person to live in the house of another without prejudice to the property.
     2. It differed from a usufruct in this, that the usufructuary might have applied the house to any purpose, as, a store or manufactory; whereas
 by the City of Bellevue.

The project involved the removal of ceilings and flooring that contained asbestos and that were covered with mold and mildew mildew, name for certain fungi and protists, for the diseases they cause in various crops, and for the discoloration (and sometimes the weakening and disintegration) they cause in such materials as leather, fabrics, and paper.  found to be toxic to humans. "The state's Department of Labor & Industries inspected the property and cited Forest City for the very allegations that are in our complaint," Senn added.

The suit alleges that in December 1997, Forest City, acting as its own general contractor A general contractor is an organization or individual that contracts with another organization or individual (the owner) for the construction of a building, road or any other execution of work or facility. , hired a certified asbestos removal company to rid the apartment complex of asbestos laden ceilings and floors. After a small fraction of the work was completed, this company was dismissed by Forest City, and transient manual laborers were brought in to finish the job.

These workers were ordered to remove the asbestos- and mold- and mildew-laden material from the interior floors and ceilings without any protective clothing, respirators or safety equipment. In addition, the workers, none of whom were certified to handle such a job, worked without a supervisor certified in asbestos removal.

In the same complaint, Forest City, its affiliates, and a California general contracting firm, Red Line Construction, and its owner, were charged with similar conduct in the 1995 renovation of The Knolls, a 260-unit apartment complex in Orange, Calif.

As with the Colony Woods project, the suit alleges that Forest City was well aware of the presence of asbestos and lead paint on the project by virtue of an earlier environmental report, which disclosed all hazardous materials.

Nevertheless, Forest City and Red Line Construction forced numerous employees to toil for more than 18 months to remove asbestos-laden vinyl flooring and lead paint without any safety precautions. These hazardous materials were also illegally disposed of in public landfills.

Further, in violation of state law, Forest City failed to post disclosure of the presence of asbestos at either project. Instead, the company communicated to the workers that none of the materials contained asbestos and no safety precautions were necessary. Workers were informed that refusal to complete the work without safety equipment would be grounds for immediate termination.

The suit also alleges that hazardous materials from the projects were disposed of illegally and were simply thrown out the windows of the units into unapproved un·ap·proved  
adj.
Not approved or sanctioned: an unapproved vaccine; an unapproved protest march. 
, unmarked waste receptacles There are various different kinds of waste receptacle:
  • The traditional dustbin or rubbish bin, often used in the house.
  • Trash cans or ashcans, an outdoor version of the dustbin made of metal.
  • Dumpsters or skips.
  • Wastepaper Baskets.
  • Trash barrels.
 or onto the ground. In addition, the suit alleges that Forest City intentionally and illegally dumped the hazardous materials into the city landfills, thereby polluting pol·lute  
tr.v. pol·lut·ed, pol·lut·ing, pol·lutes
1. To make unfit for or harmful to living things, especially by the addition of waste matter. See Synonyms at contaminate.

2.
 the nearby communities.

This improper removal and disposal saved Forest City approximately $1.5 million.

Senn Palumbo Meulemans LLP specializes in real-estate litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. The act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; any dispute.

When a person begins a civil lawsuit, the person enters into a process called litigation.
 with an emphasis on construction defect defense and premises liability. The firm also boasts strong general commercial business litigation, labor and employment and appellate practices. The firm has offices in San Francisco San Francisco (săn frănsĭs`kō), city (1990 pop. 723,959), coextensive with San Francisco co., W Calif., on the tip of a peninsula between the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay, which are connected by the strait known as the Golden , Irvine and San Diego San Diego (săn dēā`gō), city (1990 pop. 1,110,549), seat of San Diego co., S Calif., on San Diego Bay; inc. 1850. San Diego includes the unincorporated communities of La Jolla and Spring Valley. Coronado is across the bay. , Calif., as well as Las Vegas Las Vegas (läs vā`gəs), city (1990 pop. 258,295), seat of Clark co., S Nev.; inc. 1911. It is the largest city in Nevada and the center of one of the fastest-growing urban areas in the United States.  and Reno, Nev. where it practices as Practical Law Management.
COPYRIGHT 1999 Business Wire
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1999, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 Reader Opinion

Title:

Comment:



 

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Business Wire
Date:Sep 21, 1999
Words:738
Previous Article:Interactive Music Retains Wall Street West for Investor Awareness Campaign.
Next Article:Recruiters Search for High Tech Talent at the 1-Jobs.com Portland Career Fair.



Related Articles
LAPD APOCALYPSE? COP SCANDAL COST MAY BE COLOSSAL, THREATENING CITY SERVICES.
OGNER NAMES RUSNAK IN COURT PETITION.
ACTIVISTS FILE LAWSUIT AGAINST ROAD DEVELOPERS; BORCHARD PLAN CALLED UNSAFE.
RENTERS SUE MOBILE-HOME PARK OWNERS; RESIDENTS ALLEGE FRAUD, CONTRACT BREACH AT WESTLAKE SITE.
PASSENGERS SUE OVER PORT CHARGES.
LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCIES JOIN IN STATE'S DWP SUIT.
DWP'S RATE-CUT FAILURE THE REAL INJUSTICE UTILITY HIDING BEHIND GENERATION, TRANSMISSION DEBTS, OTHER PLANS.
TRASH COLLECTORS SUED RESIDENTS CLAIM THEY WERE OVERCHARGED.
LOCKYER'S LEGAL SHORT CIRCUIT LAWSUIT DURING SEMPRA ENERGY ANTITRUST TRIAL COULD BENEFIT DONORS.
LOCKYER SLAPS SEMPRA WITH GOUGING LAWSUIT.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2012 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters | Submit articles