"Straight Pride". (Making a Difference).On the afternoon of January 16, 2001, 16-year-old Elliott Corbett, then a sophomore, currently a junior, at Woodbury High School in St. Paul St. Paul as a missionary he fearlessly confronts the “perils of waters, of robbers, in the city, in the wilderness.” [N.T.: II Cor. 11:26] See : Bravery , Minnesota, was told by an assistant principal that a female student had registered a complaint against a sweat-shirt he had worn to school that day. The girl represented a group of homosexual and lesbian students offended by the "Straight Pride" logo embossed em·boss tr.v. em·bossed, em·boss·ing, em·boss·es 1. To mold or carve in relief: emboss a design on a coin. 2. on the front of the shirt, and a picture of a stick man and woman holding hands on the back. According to according to prep. 1. As stated or indicated by; on the authority of: according to historians. 2. In keeping with: according to instructions. 3. Elliott and his parents, Kendal and Lana Corbett, the shirt was not intended to denigrate den·i·grate tr.v. den·i·grat·ed, den·i·grat·ing, den·i·grates 1. To attack the character or reputation of; speak ill of; defame. 2. other sexual lifestyles, but rather to make a positive statement about heterosexuality het·er·o·sex·u·al·i·ty n. Erotic attraction, predisposition, or sexual behavior between persons of the opposite sex. heterosexuality at a school that caters to homosexual students by displaying inverted inverted reverse in position, direction or order. inverted L block a pattern of local filtration anesthesia commonly used in laparotomy in the ox. pink triangles (widely-recognized symbols of the homosexual movement) at so-called "safe" sites set aside for student/teacher discussions and counseling about homosexuality and other non-traditional relationships. In the words of Mrs. Corbett, her son's intent was to show support "for the traditional and wholesome way to approach sex ... which is God's plan." The next day, Elliott, a devout Christian, was summoned to the office of principal Dana Babbitt and told that he would not be allowed to wear the sweatshirt because it violated the school's dress code prohibiting the wearing of items with unacceptable written or graphic depictions that offend others. "Unacceptable" depictions were defined as those commonly viewed as vulgar, obscene, or socially demeaning de·mean 1 tr.v. de·meaned, de·mean·ing, de·means To conduct or behave (oneself) in a particular manner: demeaned themselves well in class. or derogatory. His sweatshirt messages, Babbitt told him, were not only offensive to the school's gay, lesbian, and bisexual students, but could cause safety problems. On April 2, 2001, the Center for Law & Policy, legal arm of the American Family Association The American Family Association (AFA) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that promotes conservative Christian values.[1][2][3][4] It was founded in 1977 by Rev. , filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of Elliott and his parents, contending that the school's disciplinary action against him constituted viewpoint discrimination, and that the school's display of inverted pink triangles promoted homosexuality. On May 17, 2001, Judge Donovan W. Frank of the U.S. District Court for Minnesota, noting that there was indeed "a strong likelihood" that the school's action was unconstitutional, issued a preliminary injunction A temporary order made by a court at the request of one party that prevents the other party from pursuing a particular course of conduct until the conclusion of a trial on the merits. A preliminary injunction is regarded as extraordinary relief. allowing Elliott to wear the sweatshirt. On January 2nd of this year, he rendered his final decision. While rejecting the claim that the school was promoting homosexuality, and agreeing that there are circumstances when a school can prohibit student expression ordinarily protected by the U.S. Constitution, Judge Frank held that in Elliott's case Woodbury High officials had failed to demonstrate that the shirt could disrupt school activities. "Maintaining a school community of tolerance includes the tolerance of such viewpoints, as expressed by 'Straight Pride,'" he wrote in his 10-page decision. Stephen M. Crampton, chief counsel for the Center for Law & Policy, described the ruling as "a tremendous victory for student free speech and a small step toward exposing the hypocrisy of the 'tolerance' agenda." |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||

Printer friendly
Cite/link
Email
Feedback
Reader Opinion