"Cloud" Health-Care Workers.

Certain bacteria dispersed by health-care workers can cause hospital infections. Asymptomatic health-care workers colonized rectally, vaginally, or on the skin with group A streptococci have caused outbreaks of surgical site infection by airborne dispersal. Outbreaks have been associated with skin colonization or viral upper respiratory tract infection in a phenomenon of airborne dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus called the "cloud" phenomenon. This review summarizes the data supporting the existence of cloud health-care workers.

A variety of infectious agents can be transmitted from health-care workers to patients (1,2). Certain of these agents are transmissible through the air, which means that transmission from health-care workers can occur in spite of standard infection control measures such as handwashing. Thus, airborne transmission increases the likelihood that an outbreak can occur. While it is well known that health-care workers can transmit infections such as tuberculosis, varicella, and influenza by the airborne route, it is less well appreciated that they can also transmit certain bacterial pathogens through the air.

Bacteria transmissible through the air for which no data support transmission by health-care workers include Clostridium diphtheriae, Haemophilus infiuenzae, Neisseria meningiditis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Yersinia pestis. For all these agents except S. pneumoniae, the epidemiologic data supporting airborne transmission are strong enough that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that infected patients be placed on droplet precautions (3). However, for all five agents, no episodes are well documented of health-care workers transmitting such infections to other patients by the airborne route, perhaps because workers with such infections may be too sick to work. For three other bacteria, Bordetella pertussis, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus, strong data support airborne transmission from health-care workers to patients.

Bordetella pertussis

Although most children are vaccinated against B. pertussis and the vaccine is quite effective up to age 12, approximately 50% of adults are nonimmune (4). Thus, in a vaccinated population, transmission of pertussis is primarily from adults to either nonimmune children ([is less than] 1 year of age) or to adults whose immunity has waned. Several well-described hospital outbreaks of pertussis have occurred in which B. pertussis was thought to be transmitted to or from health-care workers in a manner suggesting airborne transmission (Table 1) (5-9). Most hospital outbreaks have involved pediatric patients (5,6,8,9), but at least one outbreak has occurred in a nursing home (7). No prolonged carrier state has been identified (10,11), and transmission is most likely associated with active symptoms, particularly coughing (12). The use of air samplers and polymerase chain reaction analysis has shown that B. pertussis DNA can be found in the air surrounding patients with B. pertussis infection, providing further evidence of airborne spread (13). Terminating B. pertussis hospital outbreaks involves removing symptomatic health-care workers from clinical care, isolating symptomatic or exposed patients, and treating symptomatic and exposed health-care workers and patients with antibiotics.

Table 1. Hospital Bordetella pertussis outbreaks involving health-care
workers and possible airborne transmission

                  Health-
                    care     Other                    Infected
                  workers    adults      Patient      patients
Reference          (no.)     (no.)     population       (no.)

Kurt (5)              5        1      Pediatrics          2
                      4        0      Pediatrics          0
Linneman (6)         13        0      Pediatrics          6
Addis (7)             5        0      Nursing Home        4
Christie (8)         87        0      Pediatrics          1
Nouvellon (9)         1        0      Pediatrics          1

Group A Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS)

Health-care worker-associated GAS outbreaks attributed to airborne spread are uncommon, associated only with asymptomatic health-care workers, and involving only surgical site infections (14-18). The health-care workers carrying GAS may be present during surgery (e.g., anesthesiologist, operating room nurse) (16,17) or not present at all (e.g., medical attendant, operating room technician) (14,15,18). In five GAS outbreaks associated with health-care workers (Table 2), volumetric or settle plate air cultures showed that the health-care workers dispersed GAS into the air. Sites of GAS colonization identified on the health-care workers include the rectum, vagina, and skin. The mechanism by which GAS becomes airborne is not entirely clear and could include increased activity (14), friction with clothing, or, in the case of an anesthesiologist who was a rectal carrier, flatulence. Such outbreaks may cause substantial illness and even death. Termination of GAS health-care worker-associated outbreaks requires eradicating the carrier state with antibiotics. In some cases eradication has been difficult because the health-care workers' family was also colonized with GAS, which may have led to initial treatment failure.

Table 2. Hospital group A streptococcal outbreaks suggesting airborne
transmission by asymptomatic health-care workers

                                                              Infected
                   Health-care      Source of     Patient     patients
Reference             worker        GAS(a,b)    population     (no.)

McKee (14,15)    Attendant          Rectum      Gynecologic      11
Schaffner (16)   Anesthesiologist   Rectum      Surgical         20
Berkelman (17)   OR nurse           Vagina      Surgical         10
Mastro (18)      OR technician      Scalp       Surgical         20

(a) GAS air cultures were all positive

(b) GAS = Group A Streptococcus, OR = operating room

Staphyloccoccus aureus

Factors affecting the airborne dispersal of S. aureus have been studied more intensively than those of any other organism. In the general population, airborne dispersal of S. is uncommon and appears to be quantitatively related to the number of S. aureus colonizing the anterior nares (19). Up to 10% of healthy S. aureus nasal carriers disperse the organism into the air (20), and females are much less likely to disperse the organism than males (21,22). Such airborne dispersers typically were surrounded by 0.01 to 0.1 CFU/[m.sup.3] of S. aureus and, rarely, as high as 2.6 CFU/[m.sup.3] (21,22). Hare and Thomas demonstrated that when agar plates were held directly under the noses of nasal carriers of S. aureus, airborne dispersal was insignificant with nasal breathing, counting, coughing 6 times, or sneezing once (23). Only with snorting did substantial dispersal occur. In contrast, when the same volunteers were moving, large numbers of S. aureus were dispersed into the air. This dispersal was attributed to S. aureus on the skin and clothing, thought to be liberated into the air by friction and movement. Coughing increases airborne dispersal of organisms other than S. aureus, and lack of airborne dispersal of S. aureus through coughing is thought to be due to its rare presence in the oropharyngeal cavity. In other studies, talking increased dispersal of organisms other than S. aureus, and sneezing dramatically increased the number of bacteria dispersed into the air, including S. aureus (24,25). Ehrenkranz demonstrated that oral tetracycline caused the number of S. aureus in the nose of a nasal carrier of tetracycline-resistant S. aureus to increase by tenfold and concommitantly increased the number of S. aureus dispersed into the air (26).

In detailed studies of S. aureus transmission in a newborn nursery setting (27,28), Rammelkamp et al. found that newborn inhibits exposed to nurses who handled colonized infants acquired S. aureus 14% of the time if good handwashing was performed and 43% of the time in the absence of good handwashing (presumed direct contact transmission). Infants acquired S. aureus 10% of the time when they were exposed to nurses who were not colonized with S. aureus and who did not handle infants colonized with S. aureus (presumed airborne transmission). Under these controlled circumstances, airborne transmission was about two thirds as likely as contact transmission. The infants infected by presumed airborne transmission were four times more likely to acquire the organism first in their noses than were the infants infected by direct contact (4/16 vs. 3/49; p[is equal to]0.056). During a 3-year period, Nobel demonstrated that a few patients (8/3,675) were associated with airborne dispersal of S. aureus (29). One of eight dispersers identified was associated with an outbreak. While inactive, such patients were associated with air counts of up to 0.3 CFU/[m.sup.3] air. The highest number of S. aureus in the air was found in association with bedmaking of colonized patients (up to 4.9 CFU/ma). Elevated airborne dispersal has also been associated with individual patients (30,31). Hare and Cooke found that airborne dispersal was facilitated by eczema, mycosis fungoids, or perineal carriage (31). In a few published outbreaks, health-care workers have been identified who clearly dispersed S. aureus into the air (32,33); in one case, dispersal was thought to be due to heavy skin colonization with S. aureus (15). In other outbreaks where airborne transmission has been suspected, no air cultures were performed, so the contribution of airborne transmission was not determined (34,35). Thus, although airborne dispersal from both patients and health-care workers occurs, under the circumstances previously studied, it is relatively uncommon.

However, outbreaks associated with such airborne dispersers are frequent ([is greater than]10%) (29,32). Clearly, if some factor augments the ability of S. aureus carriers to produce airborne dispersal, the potential for S. aureus outbreaks to occur might be greatly increased. In 1960, the American Journal of Diseases of Children preceded an article with a brief editorial entitled "The Preposterous Cloud Baby" (36). The first sentence of the introduction stated "Once in a blue moon a journal is privileged to publish an article which introduces an important revolutionary concept." In the report that followed, Eichenwald et al. described a group of S. aureus-colonized, virally infected newborn infants who had the ability to disperse S. aureus from their noses into the air--so-called "cloud babies" (36). These researchers demonstrated by culture and epidemiologic study that a viral upper respiratory infection (e.g., with adenovirus or echo virus) was the essential "cloud factor." Up to 75% of newborn infants who carried S. aureus nasally became cloud babies once they acquired a viral upper respiratory infection. Most importantly, these cloud babies were also capable of causing S. aureus outbreaks (36). Although these infants had no greater risk for staphylococcal infection, the families of cloud babies had a fourfold higher risk for infection than the families of infants colonized with S. aureus that were not cloud babies. In spite of what was believed to be a revolutionary concept, no further observations about cloud babies have been published since Eichenwald's study in 1960.

In 1986 we reported that an S. aureus nasal carrier, a nurse, caused outbreaks in two newborn nurseries at different hospitals in association with upper respiratory infections (34). The nurse's strain of S. aureus and the outbreak strains were identical by phage typing. Infants' risk for acquiring staphylococcal skin disease was fivefold greater when the nurse had a upper respiratory infection. She was treated with topical bacitracin ointment and hexachlorophene baths to eradicate her S. aureus carrier state, and no further outbreaks of staphylococcal skin disease occurred. We postulated then that the probable source of the outbreak might be a cloud adult (4).

In 1996, an outbreak of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) pneumonia occurred in an intensive care unit (33). Multivariant analysis demonstrated that the only independent risk factors for MRSA pneumonia were intubation and exposure to a single physician, who was nasally colonized with the outbreak strain of MRSA as shown by molecular typing. During the outbreak period, this physician had a prolonged upper respiratory infection, and an experimental rhinovirus upper respiratory infection caused him to increase airborne dispersal of S. aureus 40-fold and become a cloud adult. The use of a mask during this experimental rhinovirus infection caused a 75% reduction in the airborne dispersal of S. aureus.

To a hospital epidemiologist, the identification of two cloud adults as the cause of the only two tightly clustered S. aureus outbreaks investigated during his career is either a striking coincidence or an indication that the frequency with which airborne transmission plays a role in S. aureus outbreaks has been underestimated. Many hospital outbreaks of S. aureus infections have been reported that were thought to be due to a single health-care worker (32-35,37-52). A few of these were probably related to heavy skin colonization (32) or sinusitis (35), but in most cases no other risk factor was apparent that could account for these persons' being capable of causing an outbreak. The role of airborne transmission was investigated in only two studies (32,33). In the group without identifiable risk factors, virtually all the health-care workers were nasally colonized with S. aureus. Indeed, S. aureus nasal colonization in health-care workers is quite common (20% to 90%) (53-56). However, if S. aureus nasal colonization was the only factor necessary to cause an outbreak, the high frequency of S. aureus nasal colonization in health-care workers should be associated with a high frequency of S. aureus outbreaks. Since this is not the case, some other factor(s) must modify the S. aureus nasal carrier state to facilitate the outbreak. One such factor is likely a viral upper respiratory infection. Since adults have an average of two viral upper respiratory infections each year (57), cloud adults may be working around patients all year.

We recently investigated the generalizability of the cloud adult phenomenon by giving six persistent nasal carriers of S. aureus a rhinovirus infection (58). One of the six volunteers became an unequivocal cloud adult, with a 40-fold increase in S. aureus airborne dispersal that could be blocked by a mask. Another volunteer had a similar increase in airborne dispersal, but it could not be prevented by a mask. The six volunteers came from a group of 18 persistent nasal carriers of S. aureus identified from 95 volunteers screened for S. aureus nasal carriage. These findings suggest that the ability to become a cloud adult could occur with a frequency of up to 6% or more in the general population.

Viral upper respiratory infections facilitate the transmission of other bacterial infections, including the following pathogens that colonize the nose: S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, H. influenzae, and N. meningitidis (59-62). Thus, cloud adults have the potential to play a role in the transmission of other organisms and might be involved with some of the explosive outbreaks of infection occasionally seen in day-care centers, homeless shelters, the military, and hospitals. Further work is necessary to understand the importance of cloud adults in the transmission of hospital infections.

This report was supported in part by RO1 AI-46558.

References

(1.) Sherertz RJ, Marosok RD, Streed SA. Infection control aspects of hospital employee health. In: RP Wenzel, editor. Prevention and Control of Nosocomial Infections. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1987. p. 295-332.

(2.) Decker MD, Schaffner W. Nosocomial diseases in healthcare workers spread by the airborne or contact routes (other than tuberculosis). In: Mayhall CG, editor. Hospital epidemiology and infection control. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. p. 859-82.

(3.) Garner JS, Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Commitee. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. CDC Hospital Infections Program Guidelines and Recommendations. 1997 Feb 18. Available from: URL:www.cdc.gov/ncidod/hip/ ISOLAT/isolat.htm.

(4.) Lambert HJ. Epidemiology of a small pertussis outbreak in Kent County, Michigan. Public Health Rep 1965;80:365-9.

(5.) Kurt TL, Yeager AS, Guenette S, Dunlop S. Spread of pertussis by hospital staff JAMA 1972;221:264-7.

(6.) Linneman CC Jr, Ramundo N, Perlstein PH, Minton SD, Englender GS. Use of pertussis vaccine in an epidemic involving hospital staff. Lancet 1975;2:540-3.

(7.) Addis DG, Davis JP, Meade BD, Burstyn DG, Meissner M, Zastrow JA, et al. A pertussis outbreak in a Wisconsin nursing home. J Infect Dis 1991;164:704-10.

(8.) Christie CD, Gover AM, Wilke MJ, Marx ML, Reising SF, Hutchinson NM. Containment of pertussis in the regional pediatric hospital during the Greater Cincinnati epidemic of 1993. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:556-63.

(9.) Nouvellon M, Gehanno J, Pestel-Caron M, Weber C, Lemeland J, Guiso N. Usefulness of pulse-field gel electropheresis in assessing nosocomial transmission of pertussis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:758-60.

(10.) Jenkinson D, Pepper JD. A search for subclinical infection during a small oubreak of whooping cough: implications for clinical diagnosis. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1986;36:547-8.

(11.) Krantz I, Alestig K, Trollfors B, Zackrisson G. The carrier state in pertussis. Scand J Infect Dis 1986;18:121-3.

(12.) Hewlett EL. Bordetella species. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone: 2000. p. 2414-21.

(13.) Aintablian N, Walpita P, Sawyer MH. Detection of Bordetella pertussis and respiratory syncytial virus in air samples from hospital rooms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:918-23.

(14.) McKee WM, di Caprio JM, Roberts CE Jr, Sherris JC. Anal carriage as the probable source of a streptococcal epidemic. Lancet 1966;2:1007-9.

(15.) McIntyre DM. Epidemic of Streptococcus pyogenes puerperal and postoperative sepsis with unusual carrier site - anus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968;101:308-14.

(16.) Schaffner W, Lefkowitz LB, Goodman JS, Koenig MG. Hospital outbreak of infection with group A streptococci traced to an asymptomatic anal carrier. N Engl J Med 1969;280:1224-5.

(17.) Berkelman RL, Martin D, Graham DR, Mowry J, Freisem R, Weber JA, et al. Streptococcal wound infections caused by a vaginal carrier. JAMA 1982;247:2680-2.

(18.) Mastro TD, Farley TA, Elliott ,IA, Facklam RR, Perks JR, Hadler JL, et al. An outbreak of surgical wound infections due to group A streptococcus carried on the scalp. N Engl J Med 1990;323:968-72.

(19.) White A. Relation between quantitative nasal cultures and dissemination of staphylococci. J Lab Clin Med 1961;58:273-7.

(20.) Huijsmans-Evers AG. Results of routine tests for the detection of dispersers of Staphylococcus aureus. Archivum Chirurgicum Neerlandia 1978;30:141-50.

(21.) Bethune DW, Blowers R, Parker M, Pask EA. Dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus by patients and surgical staff Lancet 1965;1:480-3.

(22.) Hill J, Howell A, Blowers R. Effect of clothing on dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus by males and females. Lancet 1974;2:1131-3.

(23.) Hare R, Thomas CGA. The transmission of Staphylococcus aureus. BMJ 1956;2:840-4.

(24.) Hare R, Mackenzie DM. The source and transmission of nasopharyngeal infections due to certain bacteria and viruses. BMJ 1946;1:865-70.

(25.) Duguid JP, Wallace AT. Air infection with dust liberated from clothing. Lancet 1948;2:845-9.

(26.) Ehrenkranz NJ. Person-to-person transmission of Staphylococcus aureus. Quantitative characterization of nasal carriers spreading infection. N Engl J Med 1964;271:225-30.

(27.) Rammelkamp CH Jr, Mortimer EA Jr, Wolinsky E. Transmission of streptococcal and staphylococcal infections. Ann Intern Med 1964;60:753-8.

(28.) Mortimer EA, Wolinsky E, Gonzaga AJ, Rammelkamp CH. Role of airborne transmission in staphylococcal infections. BMJ 1966; 1:319-22.

(29.) Nobel WC. The dispersal of staphylococci in hospital wards. J Clin Pathol 1962;15:552-8.

(30.) Shooter RA, Smith MA, Griffiths JD, Brown MEA, Williams REO, Rippon JE, et al. Spread of staphylococci in a surgical ward. BMJ 1958;1:607-13.

(31.) Hare R, Cooke EM. Self-contamination of patients with staphylococcal infections. BMJ 1961;2:333-6.

(32.) Tanner EI, Bullin J, Bullin CH, Gamble DR. An outbreak of post-operative sepsis due to a staphylococcal disperser. J Hyg 1980;85:219-25.

(33.) Sherertz RJ, Reagan DR, Hampton KD, Robertson KL, Streed SA, Hoen HM, et al. A cloud adult: the Staphylococcus aureus-virus interaction revisited. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:539-47.

(34.) Belani A, Sherertz RJ, Sullivan ML, Russell BA, Reumen PD. Outbreak of staphylococcal infection in two hospital nurseries traced to a single nasal carrier. Infect Control 1986;7:487-90.

(35.) Boyce JM, Opal SM, Potter-Bynoe G, Medeiros AA. Spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a hospital after exposure to a health care worker with chronic sinusitis. Ann Intern Med 1993;17:496-504.

(36.) Eichenwald H, Kotsevalov O, Fasso LA. The "cloud baby": an example of bacterial-viral interaction. Am J Dis Child 1960;100:161-73.

(37.) Dunkle LM, Naqvi SH, McCallum R, Lofgren JP. Eradication of epidemic methicillin-gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care nursery. Am J Med 1981;70:455-8.

(38.) Hedberg K, Ristinen TL, Soler JT, White KE, Hedberg CW, Osterholm MT, et al. Outbreak of erythromycin-resistant staphylococcal conjunctivitis in a newborn nursery. Pediatr J Infect Dis 1990;9:268-73.

(39.) Coovadia YM, Bhana RH, Johnson AP, Haffejee I, Marples RR. A laboratory-confirmed outbreak of rifampin-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a newborn nursery. J Hosp Infect 1989;14:303-12.

(40.) Dancer SJ, Poston SM, East J, Simmons NA, Noble WC. An outbreak of pemphigus neonatorum. J Infect 1990;20:73-82.

(41.) Gaynes R, Marosok R, Mowry-Hanley J, Laughlin C, Foley K, Friedman C, et al. Mediastinitis following coronary artery bypass surgery: a 3-year review. J Infect Dis 1991;163:117-21.

(42.) Simon PA, Chen RT, Elliott JA, Schwartz B. Outbreak of pyogenic abscesses after diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccination. Pediatr J Infect Dis 1993;12:368-71.

(43.) Nakashima AK, Allen JR, Martone WJ, Plikaytis BD, Stover B, Cook LN, et al. Epidemic bullous impetigo in a nursery due to a nasal carrier of Staphylococcus aureus: role of epidemiology and control measures. Infect Control 1984;5:326-31.

(44.) Hoeger PH, Elsner P. Staphylococcal scaled skin syndrome: transmission of exfoliatin-producing Staphylococcus aureus by an asymptomatic carrier. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1988;7:340-2.

(45.) Richardson JF, Quoraishi AH, Francis BJ, Marples RR. Betalactamase-negative, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a newborn nursery: report of an outbreak and laboratory investigations. J Hosp Infect 1990;16:109-21.

(46.) Back NA, Linnemann CC Jr, Pfaller MA, Staneck JL, Morthland V. Recurrent epidemics caused by a single strain of erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The importance of molecular epidemiology. JAMA 1993;270:1363-4.

(47.) Chowdhury MN, Kambal AM. An outbreak of infection due to Staphylococcus aureus phage type 52 in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 1992;22:299-305.

(48.) Walter CW, Kundsin RB, Brubaker MM. The incidence of airborne wound infection during operation. JAMA 1963:908-13.

(49.) Venezia RA, Harris V, Miller C, Peck H, San Antonio M. Investigation of an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients with skin disease using DNA restriction patterns. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:472-6.

(50.) Trilla A, Nettleman MD, Hollis RJ, Fredrickson M, Wenzel RP, Pfaller MA. Restriction endonuclease analysis of plasmid DNA from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: clinical application over a three-year period. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1993;14:29-35.

(51.) Payne RW. Severe outbreak of surgical sepsis due to Staphylococcus aureus of unusual type and origin. BMJ 1967;4:17-20.

(52.) Allen KD, Anson JJ, Parsons LA, Frost NG. Staff carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (EMRSA 15) and the home environment: a case report. J Hosp Infect 1997;37:74-5.

(53.) Williams REO. Healthy carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: its prevalence and importance. Bacteriol Rev 1963;27:56-71.

(54.) Haley RW, Bregman DA. The role of understaffing and overcrowding in recurrent outbreaks of staphylococcal infection in a neonatal special-care unit. J Infect Dis 1982;145:875-85.

(55.) Reagan DR, Doebbeling BN, Pfaller MA, Sheetz CT, Houston AK, Hollis RJ, et al. Elimination of coincident S. aureus nasal and hand carriage with intranasal application of mupirocin calcium ointment. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:101-6.

(56.) Waldvogel FA. Staphylococcus aureus (including toxic shock syndrome). In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. New York: Churchill Livingston; 1995. p. 1754-77.

(57.) Hamre D, Connelly AP Jr, Procknow JJ. Virologic studies of acute respiratory disease in young adults. Am J Epidemiol 1966;83:238-49.

(58.) Bassetti S, Bassetti-Wyss B, D'Agostino R, Gwaltney JM, Pfaller MA, Sherertz RJ. "Cloud adults" exist: airborne dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus associated with a rhinovirus infection [Abstract #115]. 38th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; Sept 7-10 2000; New Orleans, Louisiana.

(59.) Nichol KP, Cherry JD. Bacterial-viral interrelations in respiratory infections of children. N Engl J Med 1967;277:667-72.

(60.) Gwaltney JM, Sande MA, Austrian R, Hendley JO. Spread of Streptococcus pneumoniae in families. Relation of transfer of S. pneumoniae to incidence of colds and serum antibody. J Infect Dis 1975;132:62-8.

(61.) Harrison LH, Armstrong CW, Jenkins SR, Harmon MW, Ajello GW, Miller GB Jr, et al. A cluster of meningococcal disease on a school bus following epidemic influenza. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1005-9.

(62.) Gwaltney JM, Hayden FG. The nose and infection. Ed. by . In: Proctor DF, Andersen I, editors. The nose: upper airway physiology and the atomospheric environment. Amsterdam: Elsevier Biomedical Press; 1982. p.399-422.

Dr. Sherertz is chief of infectious diseases at Wake Forest University School of Medicine and associate hospital epidemiologist. His research interests include the pathogenesis and prevention of vascular catheter infections, as well as mechanisms of transmission of nosocomial infections, particularly S. aureus.

Address for correspondence: Robert J. Sherertz, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1042; fax: [phone]; e-mail: [e-mail]